TRM Labs, Elliptic, Crystal Intelligence, BlockSec Phalcon, Scorechain, Global Ledger, Merkle Science and AMLBot mapped to the Chainalysis product each replaces, with coverage, security and published prices checked on vendor pages on 2 November 2026, a break-even cost model and a parallel-run plan for switching.
Notabene, Sumsub, CryptoSwift, 21 Analytics, VerifyVASP, Veriscope, Global Travel Rule and TRUST compared on stated network reach, protocol interoperability, security, deployment and published prices, with every figure checked on vendor pages on 2 November 2026 and a counterparty coverage test to run before you sign.
Chainalysis, TRM Labs and Elliptic compared head to head on stated chain coverage by product, screening and monitoring, investigations, security attestations and the only published price, with every figure checked on vendor pages on 2 November 2026 and a bake-off plan to test them on your own deposits.
Nine blockchain analytics tools for crypto AML compliance, from Chainalysis, TRM Labs and Elliptic to Crystal, BlockSec Phalcon, Scorechain, Merkle Science, Global Ledger and AMLBot, scored on chain coverage, attribution, screening workflows, investigations, security and published pricing, with vendor pages checked 2 November 2026.
Blockchain analytics, KYT, wallet screening and Travel Rule tools from Chainalysis, Elliptic, TRM Labs, Notabene, Sumsub and Sygna compared on what each check does, the FATF, EU, FinCEN and OFAC rules behind it, and published pricing, with sources checked 1 November 2026.
Qualified custodians, MPC wallet platforms and self-custody multisig compared on who signs, what the SEC custody rule and 2025 guidance require, insurance scope, M-of-N failure odds and year-one list cost, with sources checked 1 November 2026.
BitGo, Coinbase Prime and Fidelity Digital Assets compared as qualified custodians: legal entities, audits, insurance, assets, staking and what a custody quote costs, scored on our six weighted criteria and checked on 25 October 2026.
Eight crypto treasury management platforms for businesses compared: approval controls, SOC reports, payouts, accounting sync, coverage and published prices, with a year-one cost model, all checked on vendor pages on 1 November 2026.
Eight BitGo alternatives, from chartered custodians to MPC wallet platforms, scored against a BitGo benchmark, with BitGo's billing method decoded, Porto's flat fee as implied basis points and year-one self-custody costs, all checked on 25 October 2026.
Fireblocks, Utila and Dfns scored on six weighted criteria, with a diagram of who holds each MPC key share, a volume cost curve and year-one cost in three operating scenarios from public list prices, all checked on 25 October 2026.